Cory Asbury

Is God’s Love Reckless? A Long Overdue and Mostly Superfluous Review of Cory Asbury’s Smash Hit ‘Reckless Love’

/ Jason Henry / Leave a comment

It had to be done.

I simply could not claim to write a theological worship song review blog without confronting the greatest worship controversy of our age: Is God’s love reckless? I doubt our pal Cory knew what a can of worms he was opening when he and his coauthors penned “Reckless Love,” but now that I’ve seen his TikToks, I’m pretty sure he eats cans of worms for breakfast and would gladly do it all over again.

So: “Reckless Love.” Cory Asbury, Caleb Culver, and Ran Jackson. Biblical or heretical? Should you sing it in church or walk out as soon as you hear that electric guitar lead line? Will it worship?? Here goes.

Focus

The two themes of this song are God’s relentless love and the humble response of the undeserving recipient. I wouldn’t call this song self-centered, but it is very focused on the love relationship between the individual and the Lord.

What are the main themes of the song? Is it God-centered or me-centered? How does it address God?

Lyric Analysis

THE DEEPLY THEOLOGICAL VERSES
Verse 1 draws together ideas from Zephaniah 3:17, Genesis 2:7, Psalm 139:13-16, and Jeremiah 1:5. God knows us before we are born, even before we are conceived. He gives us life, delights in us, sings over us! Even before we exist, our Father is drawing us into his story.

If the first verse is about God loving us before we are even born, verse 2 is about his love for us before we come to know and love Jesus. Romans 5:8-10 and Ephesians 2:1-5 teach us that before we believed, we were dead in our sins, alienated from the life of God, enslaved both by our own passions and oppressive demonic forces, living as God’s enemies. But even while we were in this state, Christ died to reconcile us to God!

When the world or our own fears tell us we are worthless, Jesus says that he gave the very highest price to buy us back from slavery: himself. (Titus 2:14)

THE UNRELENTING BRIDGE
I’m going out of order. Sorry. 🤷 In the bridge, Jesus be climbing up walls, kicking down mountains, and lighting up shadows to come after me. Or something like that.

Jesus’ divine nature as the Light of the World is a recurring theme in Scripture. John 1:5 says, “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overtake it.” This is part of a longer description of Christ’s incarnation, his humble entry into the world of flesh to make God known to us and invite us into his family. So he lights up shadows in pursuit of us. John also ties Jesus’ identity as the Light to his identity as the Truth. As love casts out fear (1 Jn 4:18), so truth casts out lies (Eph 4:25), and Jesus’ light tears down the lies that would prevent us from being drawn into his family.

I can’t think of any specific examples of Jesus climbing a mountain to reach us, but I take this as a metaphor for the many obstacles he overcame in order to extend his love to us, especially the cross and the humiliating death he willingly endured there (Heb 12:2, Ph 2:8). Ephesians 2:13-15 tells us that he tore down the walls between people (hostility) and between humanity and God (the Law) in his own flesh on the cross.

I think the bridge comes off a little bit Calvinist, which could be a good or bad thing depending on your tradition and beliefs. The idea of God kicking down every wall to come after me does feel a bit like the doctrine of irresistible grace, though it stops short of fully taking that position.

THE RECKLESS CHORUS
While the title of this song is indeed “Reckless Love,” “reckless” is just one of many adjectives applied to God’s love here in the chorus. I don’t even think it’s the most important one. The best song titles highlight what is unique about a song, not necessarily the most important point the song makes. There are lots of songs about how God’s love is overwhelming and unending, but this is the first mainstream worship hit to make use of the word “reckless,” and it certainly makes a splash.

Especially when taken together with the verses and bridge, this chorus is about how God’s love will overcome every obstacle to pursue us wherever we are. It characterizes the love God displays throughout Jesus’ parables in Luke 15. The father of the Prodigal Son exposes himself to ridicule by running out to meet his son. The son is overwhelmed. A woman spends costly oil and crawls around her house to find her lost coin. She won’t quit until it’s found. And (as specifically referenced in the song), the shepherd who loses one sheep abandons his 99 others in pursuit of the one missing. Reckless behavior perhaps? These parables show the intense love of God the Father for those who are lost from him.

Referring to the worshiper, this song says, “I couldn’t earn it, I don’t deserve it, still You give Yourself away.” Ephesians 2:8-9 teaches us that God’s grace and salvation (inextricably tied to his love) are free gifts, not anything we could earn. “Deserve” is a tricky word, and I think there is a sense in which we deserve God’s love and a sense in which we don’t. Fortunately, this line is explained in verse 2: “When I was your foe, still your love fought for me.” Our natural state apart from God is to be enslaved in our sin, and our only earned or deserved relationship to him is that of an enemy. Still, God extends his love to us. He has made us in his image, called us into his family, and shown our inestimable worth to him through his sacrifice on the cross.

BUT IS IT RECKLESS THOUGH???
As Pilate asks, “What is truth” (Jn 18:38) so we must ask, “What is reckless?” Merriam-Webster gives two definitions, but one of them is a two-parter, so let’s call it three:

  1. Marked by a lack of proper caution
  2. Careless of consequences
  3. Irresponsible

I think when people get hung up on this word in this song, they are primarily thinking of definition #3. God is certainly not irresponsible. Jesus isn’t a reckless driver, a kid who didn’t do his homework, or a gambling addict who lost it all on the ponies and can’t feed his family. I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest that no reasonable person, Christian or otherwise, would hear the words of this song and think that’s the kind of recklessness the author intends to ascribe to our Lord.

There’s a case to be made for #1, since a constant criticism the Pharisees had for Jesus was that he didn’t show proper caution in associating with sinners, healing on the Sabbath, and acting like he had authority to forgive sins.

But I think the definition closest to Cory, Caleb, and Ran’s meaning here is #2. God knew exactly what the consequences of pursuing us to the cross with his love would be, and he didn’t care. He did it anyway. If I see my daughter run out in front of a train, and I leap onto the tracks to shove her out of the way, no one would criticize the preacher at my funeral for calling that a reckless act of love. So it seems perfectly appropriate to me to call Christ’s incarnation and ultimate sacrifice acts of reckless love.

“But Jason!” you say, “‘Recklessness’ is still bad! We mustn’t tarnish God’s reputation with words bearing negative connotations!”

My response is that the Bible itself uses negative words and exaggeration for effect, even when describing God! God loves Jacob and hates Esau (Rm 9:13). Jesus tells us that we have to hate our mothers, fathers, spouses, children, and our own lives to be his disciples (Lk 14:26). In 1 Corinthians 1:25, Paul has the audacity to say, “God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.” God foolish and weak? Blasphemy!

The same understanding of poetic language and figures of speech that allows us to make sense of these passages also enables us to call God’s love reckless without distorting the truth of his wisdom and foresight.

So, yes! God’s love is reckless. And, no! God’s love isn’t exactly reckless. But the word has great poetic value in the unique and poignant way it captures Christ’s willing self-sacrifice.

(For a counterpoint to my view, John Piper raises some concerns about this word, even while rejoicing in how Calvinistic many of the lyrics are. He brings up the theology of open theism in which God chooses not to know what all of our individual choices will be and suggests that the word “reckless” implies this theology. I think that’s a huge leap.)

Accessibility

The only people who misinterpret this song are established Christians who have a theological objection to calling God’s love reckless. The language is quite transparent except for the phrase “leaves the 99,” which means nothing unless you’re familiar with the parable it refers to.

To be honest, this song is a little tricky to sing, mostly due to rhythm and prosody. The range is an octave+5, which is a little wide but also typical for contemporary worship. In practice, I have found that congregations are more than happy to learn the melody and belt this song out. (And at this point, everyone probably knows it already.)

Music

One thing I love about this song is its musical versatility. You can sing it with a worship band, an orchestra, or just a piano. For example, the iconic opening lead line works great on almost any instrument. The dynamics and chord progression follow the typical worship song patterns, but they’re classic for a reason. There’s a good build through the bridge, and the chorus works great loud and soft.

The thing that sets this song apart musically is the way dotted eighth note melody of the chorus and lead line sits on top of the 6/8 beat. The melody feels like it’s in 4/4 even though it’s not, and this offers some really cool musical tension that pulls you forward through the song. It also offers a challenge for drummers! The only solution I have is to encourage your musicians to listen to this song on repeat for a while until they really internalize the underlying beat and the main melody and how they fit together.

Function

Gathering | Word | Table | Sending

This one works best in the middle of a worship service. It is intimate and communicates both the truth of God’s love to us and our humble and needy (in a good way!) response to him.

It would be super cool to use this song immediately following a reading or dramatic presentation of any of the Luke 15 parables.

Conclusions

Will it worship? Of course it will! This is a powerful worship anthem that has expressed the love of God in a fresh way to a whole generation. It’s accessible, deep, mostly singable, and teaches biblical truth. I am thoroughly convinced that no one has ever learned any bad theology from this song, and I remain in awe at the reckless love of our Savior.

Image by Vital Sinkevich on Unsplash

Scripture quotations are taken from the New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition. Copyright © 2021 National Council of Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

KIND – Cory Asbury

/ Jason Henry / Leave a comment


I’ve been a Cory Asbury fan since his IHOP days. “So Good to Me” and “Where I Belong” were impactful songs for me during my high school days, “Reckless Love” is a classic, and “The Father’s House” is one of my recent worship faves (I should really write blogs about both of those. Everybody loves to argue about whether God’s love is reckless or not! 🤓). But “Kind” isn’t just a Cory song; it also benefits from the writing talents of Jesse Reeves, Paul Mabury, and Steve Fee.

I stumbled upon “Kind” when my wife sent it to me on TikTok in February this year. Since then, it’s been published on his most recent album Pioneer. A far cry from the goofball antics that often populate Cory’s social media, “Kind” is a heartbreaking testimony of trying to find God’s goodness in the midst of sin and pain. In this blog, I’m not just trying to discern whether a song is true or good but whether it will be beneficial in most corporate worship services. So, is “Kind” biblical? And is it appropriate for Sunday worship? Let’s find out!

Focus

This song is about our doubt, sin, and pain, and God’s response of kindness toward us, specifically in the cross of Christ.

“Kind” spends a lot of words talking about “me.” It takes a first-person perspective to intimately reflect on our thoughts, feelings, and experiences. But I don’t think that makes it a self-centered song. The simple phrase “all He’s ever been is kind” stands in sharp contrast to the many words of our striving, failing, and questioning. God’s kindness is magnified by our desperate need for it.

This song mostly refers to God as “He,” assuming that we will know who it’s referring to. In case we don’t, Jesus is identified by name in the chorus.

Lyric Analysis

VERSE 1
The first verse addresses some of the most painful circumstances we experience in this life: divorce, loss of a child, addiction, and praying for healing without receiving it. Rather than making truth claims, this verse expresses personal experience. The singer admits to having doubts about God’s existence and his character, wondering how he decides who should receive healing.

I have mixed feelings about expressing this kind of doubt in worship. On the one hand, everyone experiences doubts on their faith journey. Many people in the Bible also express pain and doubt, including Lazarus’ sisters, David, the psalmists, the Teacher in Ecclesiastes, and Job. While each worshiper may not have suffered the same experiences as the songwriters of “Kind,” this verse casts a wide net for the kinds of things in life that lead us to doubt God. Acknowledging these doubts together in worship reminds us that we’re not alone, and that our doubts don’t make us “bad” Christians or condemn us to hell.

A friend and colleague asked me recently about worship songs for people struggling with their mental health. I found that almost all the songs we sing are positive and celebratory. Even those that acknowledge our pain and sin end on a note of victory. In a sense, that is appropriate, since we believe that the victory of Jesus is the ultimate destiny of creation. But in the here and now, ending every song on a happy note sometimes negates the pain and doubt people are still experiencing.

On the other hand, these kind of doubts certainly don’t praise God, so it just feels weird to sing them in church. Is that a real problem or just my discomfort with difficult emotions? I’m not sure. I do know that praise isn’t the only kind of worship. Trusting God with our doubts, fears, and pain honors him too.

VERSE 2
Where the first verse was focused on suffering and bad circumstances, this verse stressed regret for the wrong things we have done. The singer admits to burning bridges with people, abandoning relationships and situations after making a mess of them. This verse acknowledges that God forgives us for these things, but that we often find it difficult to forgive ourselves for our sins. We sometimes feel that we are somehow worse than everyone else, too broken for God to love. Again, these particular experiences and feelings might not be universal, but they are representative.

CHORUS
The chorus describes more personal experiences, mostly paired as opposites. Sometimes the author has fled from God, and sometimes he has hurt people in his zealotry. He’s been patient and insistent in turns. He’s even gone so far as to “curse His name in anger,” the most provocative line in the song.

Cursing God is mentioned a few times in Scripture, most notably in Job. The title character of this book experiences the loss of his livestock, his health, and even his children. Far from encouraging him, his wife tells him to quiet being so righteous and just “curse God and die.” Job refuses, and the text tells us that to do so would have been sin, but the rest of the book shows us his struggle with his faith (Job 2:9-10). The reward for sin is death, but forgiveness and eternal life can be found in Jesus (Rom. 3:23), and he tells us that even blasphemy will be forgiven (Matt. 12:32). So cursing God is not recommended by this song, and it is not something that all Christians have done per se, but we have all sinned, and we have all dishonored God sometimes in response to our pain and circumstances.

The chorus also contains the primary truth claim of this song: “all He’s ever been is kind.” But is God only ever kind? Paul seems to push back on this in Romans 11:11-24. In verse 22, he says, “Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off.” So those who cut themselves off from God experience his severity, and those who remain in him experience his kindness. But in the very next verse, we learn that even God’s punishment is intended to bring people back into his family: “even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again.” There is kindness even in the severity of God.

So the chorus gives us opportunity to acknowledge the ways we have sinned against God, and it tells us that he responds to all of our failings with kindness. At the end of the song we replace the line about cursing God with the admission, “He knows I don’t deserve it, but He’s never changed His mind.” This echoes Paul’s words in Romans 5:8, “God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” Even in the midst of our rebellion and failures, God maintains faithful lovingkindness towards us.

BRIDGE
God’s kindness is not squishy or passive. He does not ignore our sin, but instead bears it himself on the cross. God’s kindness is at the expense of his own Son, also God himself, dying a criminal’s torturous death. This stark image shows us that God’s kindness is not cheap, not will it be mocked or taken advantage of. It is a serious kindness, bent on our redemption at any cost.

Accessibility

The meaning of this song is clear to anyone: God is kind even when we doubt and even in the midst of our pain. There is some risk of misapprehending the line “all He’s ever been is kind,” as an endorsement of cheap grace or a vision of God lacking justice, wrath, or discipline. The bridge does much to counteract this concern. I think a lot of people will be uncomfortable singing, “I’ve cursed His name in anger.”

The range of this song is an octave and a second, which is actually pretty small for contemporary worship. I don’t find the verses especially easy for a congregation to pick up immediately, but the chorus is catchy and 3 times is likely enough to pick it up.

Music

Like the rest of the Pioneer, “Kind” has a country flavor. It relies on acoustic finger-picking, some light snare work (probably with brushes), and simple piano chords for the rhythmic backbone. Steel guitar, bass, and “ooh” vocals fill out the soundscape. The simple, subdued instrumentation is this song’s strength, and church bands who play it should exercise lots of restraint. This is definitely one of those “fragile egg” songs that will break if you aren’t gentle with it.

The chords themselves are simple, but there are a lot of them, so it’s probably worth a couple minutes to make sure everybody in the band is playing them at the same times. Other than that, the song isn’t rhythmically challenging. The lead vocal has some tricky timing.

Conclusions

“Kind” is a powerful song that reflects seriously on the pain and doubt that are part of the human experience. Rather than explaining or minimizing them, it simply places God’s kindness in their midst and reminds us that Jesus suffered too.

I thought this song was going to be a “no.” I thought the blunt and sometimes harsh descriptions of our doubts and pains were too uncomfortable and personal for a worship service. But if the author of Psalm 88 can say express his feelings of loss and abandonment and doubt before God, then maybe we should too. This song honors the suffering and doubt that all Christians experience in a way that few other songs do, and it presents God’s kindness in a clear and unique way. So then I wanted to say “yes!”

But I can’t get past the feeling that this song isn’t very congregational. I also still feel weird that roughly 1/3 of this song’s 26 lines are about God and his character while 2/3 are about our problems. This song could function very meaningfully in a worship service, but (like many testimony songs) it might be better suited to special music than congregational singing. Not everyone can fully identify with all the problems listed in this song, and many people will have a problem confessing to cursing God’s name in anger when that’s something they don’t believe they’ve done.

So after all that, I think we land in “maybe” territory with this one. “Kind” is a beautiful, valuable, insightful song that will continue to minister to many people in the depths of fear, doubt, and pain. It respects those trials by refusing to give them a trite answer, and it glorifies Jesus by declaring his kindness into the midst of them. But I don’t think Sunday-morning congregational singing is the best vehicle for this song to do its work.

Image by Francisco Gonzalez from Unsplash

Scripture quotations are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. May not copy or download more than 500 consecutive verses of the ESV Bible or more than one half of any book of the ESV Bible.

HOMECOMING – Bethel Music, Cory Asbury, Gable Price

/ Jason Henry / 2 Comments

Image by Kevin Delvecchio from Unsplash

“Homecoming” is the title track from Bethel’s 2021 worship release. I’ve already reviewed “Send Me” from the same album, and you can find that review here. “Homecoming” is the work of Cory Asbury, Brian Johnson, Gable Price, and Christian Ostrom, and covers a broad arc of the Gospel and its implications for our lives, past, present, and future. Where this song really stands out is the bridge, where it paints a beautiful picture of our arrival and celebration in heaven. Is this picture of heaven biblical, and will this song serve your congregation well in worship? Let’s check it out!

Focus

The verses and chorus of “Homecoming” focus on our responsibility for our sin and the great work of Jesus that exchanged our death for life through his crucifixion and resurrection. The bridge dwells on joy-filled imagery of the our future reunion with God, our families, and the global Church. There’s a lot of “I” language, but it’s mostly related to the admission of guilt. It’s clear that the glory in this song belongs only to God, as he’s the one doing away with sin and welcoming us into our homecoming.

Lyric Analysis

VERSE 1
“Homecoming” comes right out of the gate with a confession of sin. In fact, both verses start with the line, “Lord, I confess.”

Here at the beginning, we confess being criminals, particularly in stealing breath from God and singing our own songs. What in the world does that mean? I think we’re referring here to the breath of life that God gave Adam at creation, and which God provides to all living people as a continual gift (Gen. 2:7, Isa. 42:5). In this verse, singing my own song is a metaphor for using the breath and life God has given me for my own purposes and glory instead of his.

Next, we confess our lack of innocence, which is appropriate since all of us have sinned (Rom. 3:23). Further, we admit that our shackles are something we purchased ourselves. Romans 6:23 tells us that the wages of sin is death, so being shackled to the dead weight of our sin is indeed the reality that we buy when we choose to use the gift of life to sin rather than to sing God’s glory.

VERSE 2

In this verse, we identify with the Prodigal Son from Jesus’ parable in Luke 15:11-32. Though he was born into a family with a loving father and an inheritance, he spurned his family and squandered his inheritance. This is what we do when we choose to wander from God rather than dwell with him in his house and under his provision and protection as in Psalm 23.

But then Jesus came! In Ephesians 2:11-22, Paul is addressing Gentile believers and how before Jesus, they were separated, walled off, from God and his family Israel. So the walls that imprison us are really the walls that separate us from God and his family. Verse 14 says, “For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility.” This is how we pass from death to life and into intimate familial fellowship with Jesus and the Father (John 5:24, Eph 2:18-19).

CHORUS
Our sins are described as scarlet, red, and crimson in Isaiah 1:18, where God also promises to wash them white like snow or wool. These blood colors represent sin because when we turn from God, we have guilt on our hands like the blood of a murder victim, or perhaps a wasted animal sacrifice that only serves to keep up our outward image of religiosity (Isa. 1:15). The crimson cost of our sin, then, is the one sacrifice that can permanently remove it: the blood of Jesus (Heb. 9:12). For more on this, see my review of “Thank You Jesus for the Blood.” The next line makes this explicit, saying he nailed our debts to that “old rugged cross.” This is a reference both to the classic hymn by George Bennard, and the words of Peter in 1 Peter 2:24.

An empty slate is a fresh start. The original idiom comes from a slate tracking a ship’s navigation being wiped clean to start a new voyage. This is a refreshing and appropriate image for becoming a new creation, being born again in Jesus (John 3:3, 2 Cor. 5:17). And that empty slate is only made possible because of the empty grave, i.e., Jesus’ resurrection (Rom. 6:3-4).

So, of course, we express thanks to God for rolling away the stone that sealed Jesus in the tomb, and by extension, the stones that seal us in our own tombs of sin, and by further extension, the stones that will seal us in our tombs of literal death, as the bridge of this song will celebrate by exploring imagery of our future resurrection.

SPONTANEOUS

He’s singing to Jesus, I think. Either way, I imagine anyone in heaven is going to be smiling a lot, so I have no problem with this ad lib.

BRIDGE

So we started with confessing responsibility for our sin, then moved into the glory of Jesus paying the price for that sin and giving us new life through his resurrection. Now, we look at the future consequence of that salvation: our eternity reunited with God and his family, the Church. Like much of the Bible’s imagery describing our future resurrection, we have a mixture of concrete and abstract, metaphorical and literal. All of these, as N. T. Wright likes to say, are “signposts pointing into a fog,” images that suggest the glory and joy of our eternal state united with Jesus and one another without ever giving us a precise picture of what exactly it will be like.

I have to admit, I don’t fully understand the first line of the bridge. I think the crimson robes in question must be Jesus’ robes stained with his blood, and the ashes they are covering represent death and all the old things of earth that have passed away. Roses pushing up from embers is a connected line in the next stanza, representing something beautiful and alive being reborn from death, destruction, and pain.

The empty tomb in place of a casket represents both Jesus’ resurrection, and ours. I like how the image of the casket is used here to ground the truth of our future resurrection in our contemporary experience to make it feel more real and immediate. Not many of us have been to an ancient Jewish tomb, and it’s easy to feel a disconnect. But most of us have been to a funeral and seen a loved one lying in a casket. It is this stark, cold reality that will be undone forever at the final resurrection, and we will see our loved ones again, and be resurrected ourselves.

I’m not aware of any specific passages about children or families singing, dancing, or laughing in heaven, but these are all classic Old Testament expressions of joy or worship (Ps. 150:4, 126:2, 96:1). The Lord himself sings over us joyfully in Zephaniah 3:17. So these are all appropriate activities that I would expect all heaven’s residents to enjoy. “Rivers of tears” coming from happy memories of life is a little tougher to justify. Revelation 21:4 says, “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” I think the kind of tears referred to in this verse are clearly sad tears, not happy tears, so we don’t need to take it as a blanket prohibition on crying in heaven, merely a signpost that all reasons for mourning and sadness will be gone.

As mentioned above, it is not surprising that all heaven should sing together both in worship to God, and in celebration at the homecoming of lost sheep (Luke 15:7). The “great cloud of witnesses” comes from Hebrews 12:1, where it refers to the people of faith listed throughout Hebrews 11. The idea in this passage is that all the heroes of the Old Testament who lived and died in faith, trusting in God’s promise of the future Messiah, are gathered around as we continue the race they began, this time with Christ in full view. I think it makes sense to carry this picture forward to the finish line of the final resurrection, when our race will finally be won.

Regarding the word “homecoming,” I think this is a perfectly apt description of our future resurrection when we will be perfectly united with God and his family forever. God’s presence is our true home, regardless of other circumstances (2 Cor. 5:8), and our citizenship is in heaven, where we will receive glorious, resurrected bodies (Phil. 3:20-21). When I hear “the Father is welcoming,” I picture the father of the Prodigal Son again. In Luke 15:20, the prodigal is returning home, expecting to become a mere servant in his father’s house, but instead, “while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him.” This is the kind of love with which we can expect to be welcomed home by our Father.

SPONTANEOUS

No major issues here. We will be with our families, or at least those of them who are believers. Wizard of Oz reference. Yes, Jesus is beautiful and we will see him face to face.

Accessibility

I am a little concerned about the accessibility of this worship song. It is jam-packed with Bible references and symbols that I expect to go over many people’s heads, and they come so fast that nobody’s going to catch all of them on a first hearing. This is both a strength and a weakness; a song that is hard to understand at first is often more meaningful once you mull it over and figure it out. Additionally, while individual lines are often tricky, the main emotional thrust of each part of the song is clear. The verses are sorrow over our sin, the chorus is gratitude for forgiveness, and the bridge is the joy and longing for our heavenly homecoming.

I don’t find much danger of misinterpretation in this song.

Music

“Homecoming” follows a pretty standard worship song format. We have a quiet first verse and chorus, then a dynamic leap in verse 2 and a pair of louder choruses followed by a bridge that builds to a crescendo, a climactic final chorus, and an “oh-oh” tag for an outro. In church, I would probably end the song here, though the recording goes through a spontaneous portion followed by another repetition of the bridge and chorus. The form of the song is effective at providing a vehicle for the message, and for communicating the emotional arc of sorrow-gratitude-joyful longing.

I think the most challenging musical aspect of this song will be nailing the drum groove. The drums on the verses are syncopated and clicky, and then the bridge is one long drum roll. Vocally, the melodies of the verses and chorus are easy but not boring, and the bridge is repetitive as one would expect. The challenging part here will be the “oh-oh-oh-OH” on the outro. I’ll probably transpose it down to fit my range better, but I do that with most songs.

Conclusions

“Homecoming” is a wonderful song that has been meaningful for me in my personal worship times over the past couple months. That time for me has included the loss of a grandparent and a strained relationship with another close family member, so the hopeful tone of the bridge regarding families being brought back together at the resurrection has been comforting for me. Upon first hearing the song, that emphasis on family gave me pause, and I wondered if it might be a reason not to use it for church. Any time we sing or talk about heaven, I am always wary of losing focus on its most important feature: Jesus. The point of heaven is that we are with the Lord, and he is with his people, his Church, his family. The presence of our own family members and friends who are in Christ is an ancillary benefit, not the main point. But it is a benefit. Part of being in Christ is being a part of his family, so it is right and good to celebrate the reunion of that global family for eternity with him. Part of that global family, and the best picture we have of that joy in this life, is our relationships with our own loved ones. So I think this feature of the song is effective and faithful to Scripture, as long as we do not let it overshadow the more essential point of being at home with the Lord.

Will it worship? Yes! I anticipate introducing this song and its glorious celebration of the Gospel to my church in January. I hope it blesses them like it has blessed me.

Scripture quotations are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. May not copy or download more than 500 consecutive verses of the ESV Bible or more than one half of any book of the ESV Bible.